0
0
Read Time:1 Minute, 11 Second
Here’s an interesting bit of smarmy propaganda I discovered buried within the bowels of Harvard Business Review, no less.
The article seems relatively innocuous, a bit rambly but interesting enough. How men and women communicate to explain differences between male vs female speech patterns, in layman language.
The featured quotes are examples of speech patterns between a male politician and female politicians. The insert of these examples, obvious and blatant political hit pieces on Donald Trump, is intended to implant subconscious falsehoods hidden within the confines of a legitimate, authorative research paper.
On an educational basis, there’s absolutely no reason the article should feature opinions from two jackass politicians, much less with such one-sided venomous oveertones, opinions and inuendoes, other propaganda designed to poison the mind.
Two Lies Within One Truth propaganda.
Political dirty tricks 101. How
-
Quotes unfairly imply negative untruths, unsubstantiated, scandelous
-
No counter quote available from the person criticized or demonized (victim).
-
Framed in a scholarly manner to ensure authenticity
The reader does not question the challenge as it lies within the confines of authoritative research, published by Harvard Business Review.
Ah, propaganda. Thy name is Legend.
I think as a resource for fair and balanced editing, I will discontinue trust in the Harvard Business Review.
If you’re into that sort of fun,
Happy
0 %
Sad
0 %
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
0 %
Surprise
0 %